On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:02 AM, mike bayer
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/24/2017 07:40 PM, Robert Sami wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the response Mike,
>>
>> I agree that using Core is pretty clean. One approach I considered was
>> the following:
>>
>> ```
>> res = conn.execute(FooBase.__table__.insert(returning=
Yes, I noticed the collection.decorator would imply doing the same
validation in two different places. That will have to work for now,
but I'll keep an eye on the issue for 1.2.
Thanks Mike.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:36 PM, mike bayer wrote:
>
>
> On 01/24/2017 09:55 PM, Pedro Werneck wrote:
>>
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 11:01:41 AM UTC-5, Randy Syring wrote:
>
>
>- pymssql has struggled to find maintainers who can devote time to it
>and it is starting to languish.
>
> Have you tried speaking with the "new" Microsoft? Perhaps they'd be
willing to contribute funds or en
Mike,
While I have not done work recently committing to the project, I am one
of the maintainers. I'm an owner of the pymssql Github organization,
pay for the pymssql.org domain, and try to generally keep up with things
as time permits.
Regarding being an "active" project, that is debatable
I don't see how it's appropriate to even suggest that an open source
project close its doors simply because another project exists.If you
were the maintainer of pymssql, that would be one thing, but looking at
the commits it seems to continue to be an active project.
pymssql handles our te
On 01/24/2017 09:55 PM, Pedro Werneck wrote:
I have a relationship with a validator to automatically convert dicts
appended to the collection, so I can do something like this:
my_obj.my_collection.append({"rel_type_id": x})
Instead of this:
my_obj.my_collection.append(RelType(rel_type_id=x)
There is a proposal open to discontinue pymssql development and point
people towards pyodbc. Since pymssql is a documented backend for SA, I
figured there might be some people here who are interested.
If you have any skin in that game and want to comment, please visit the
issue: https://github
On 01/24/2017 07:40 PM, Robert Sami wrote:
Thanks for the response Mike,
I agree that using Core is pretty clean. One approach I considered was
the following:
```
res = conn.execute(FooBase.__table__.insert(returning=[FooBase.id],
values=[{} for i in range(10)]))
conn.execute(FooDerived._
