It's not different "processes". It's the difference between running
myfile.py from the python interpreter, making the module effectively
__main__, vs running myfile.py via "import myfile". Same filesystem file
but two totally different modules in the same process.
On Oct 19, 2017 4:29 PM,
Sorry I don't see any references in doc. I tried using array type but got
this error
can't render element of type
Compiler can't render element of type
Here is my column defintion
sqla.Column(sqla_types.ARRAY(sqla_types.String), default=[], nullable=False)
--
SQLAlchemy -
The Python
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 4:10:11 PM UTC-4, Taz Mainiac wrote:
>
>
> If you ran two scripts or two modules, it would also almost always fail
>> (IIRC, it is remotely possible but highly unlikely, to generate the same id
>> in another process).
>>
>
> I am not doing that.
>
>
re-read
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Jonathan Vanasco
wrote:
> On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 11:55:49 AM UTC-4, Taz Mainiac wrote:
>>
>> So - a morning spent googling does not turn up any information about
>> Python classes having a different id depending on context (script
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 11:55:49 AM UTC-4, Taz Mainiac wrote:
>
> So - a morning spent googling does not turn up any information about
> Python classes having a different id depending on context (script vs
> module). I'm probably not googling for the right thing? Can anyone point
>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Mike Bayer
wrote:
> the example calls the "myoper" python file in two different contexts,
> resulting in two different MyStatus enumeration objects. Calling
> "python myoper.py" invokes "myoper" as a plain Python script, sets up
>
Op donderdag 19 oktober 2017 03:22:31 UTC+2 schreef Mike Bayer:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Gijs Molenaar > wrote:
> > Hi again!
> >
> > This is the hopefully the last mail since this is the last failing test
> for
> > the MonetDB dialect!
> >
> > I
Op donderdag 19 oktober 2017 03:18:46 UTC+2 schreef Mike Bayer:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Gijs Molenaar > wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the intentions of this test better:
> >
> >
>
Op donderdag 19 oktober 2017 03:10:21 UTC+2 schreef Mike Bayer:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Gijs Molenaar > wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> >
> > Not sure if this a bug or something I should in my SQLAlchemy dialect,
> but
> > currently
> >
> >
> > expr =