that's great and i wish more folks would see it that way :)
On Thu, May 27, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Brendan Blanchard wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
>
> Glad to see it's in the works.
>
> As for my case, I sometimes forget I'm working in sqlalchemy *and Python*,
> and completely overlook simple Python solu
Thanks Mike,
Glad to see it's in the works.
As for my case, I sometimes forget I'm working in sqlalchemy *and Python*,
and completely overlook simple Python solutions to seemingly-sqlalchemy
related issues. Since I have a class factory (which is the only place these
classes will come from), I can
we haven't made a public APi for this however the discussion of what it would
look like is at https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/6080 and the
proposal is at
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/6080#issuecomment-801253683.
What you can do now is use sqlalchemy.orm.regi
Hi all,
I'm using a class factory to dynamically generate SQLA types and am
rightfully getting the warning:
*SAWarning: This declarative base already contains a class with the same
class name and module name as , and will be replaced in
the string-lookup table.*
when I attempt to use it twi
That seems to help. I'll make an issue for it.
śr., 26 maj 2021 o 18:16 Mike Bayer napisał(a):
> OK then please report this as a bug in sqlalchemy-utils
>
> right now they are not looking at local table
>
> looking at the code here:
> https://sqlalchemy-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/_modules/sq
