On Sun, Mar 27, 2022, at 2:56 PM, mkmo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm writing a library that uses SQLAlchemy. The user will pass the library an
> update, and the library will add a RETURNING clause for postgresql users, and
> then return the model back to the user. The idea here is to
Hi Mike,
I'm writing a library that uses SQLAlchemy. The user will pass the library
an update, and the library will add a RETURNING clause for postgresql
users, and then return the model back to the user. The idea here is to
update and select the row in a single database call, instead of the
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022, at 2:08 PM, mkmo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks. Should I use column_descriptions[0]['type'] ?
yup, that should be pretty consistent in this case.
I've implemented most of an actual feature for this but isn't committed yet at
Hi Mike,
Thanks. Should I use column_descriptions[0]['type'] ?
In my case, `type`, `expr` and `entity` all return the model class that I
am interested in.
Thanks and best regards,
Matthew
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 12:02:54 PM UTC-7 Mike Bayer wrote:
> the Project model is actually in