com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/15/2016 11:22 PM, 'Nicholas A Fries' via sqlalchemy wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike. Thanks for the reply and clarification on how the history
>> system is implemented. I will investigate further and review the code
>> you mentioned.
>>
>> Ri
though and the strange thing is, the
relationship is very much like the other ones, and they are unaffected. Hm.
I will need to investigate further.
Thanks!
Nick
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 7:18:52 PM UTC-7, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/15/2016 08:04 PM, 'Nicholas
I have a typo for item #7 in my post - this is unexpected.
Cases 7 - 10 are the problem. We don't expect there to be changes showing
for data that is the same as in the database.
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 5:01:40 PM UTC-7, Nicholas A Fries wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> The history system in
Hi guys,
The history system in SQLAlchemy seems to think that an object with the
same column values is different than what's in the database. Only it's not.
Here's a test case I wrote really quick to demonstrate the issue -
https://paste.pound-python.org/show/5FtE85ve08hVoByT6WNj/
1.
