and
faster.
Sounds like a still quite simple, but hopefully much faster solution. Do
you agree?
kind regards,
Achim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
According to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-sequence.html,
sequences are non-transactional:
Advance the sequence object to its next value and return that value. This
is done atomically: even if multiple sessions execute nextval concurrently,
each will safely receive a
tweeks and tricks to speed up inserts having
relations, I would be happy to hear them.
cheers,
Achim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr
and can see, that both cases generate the same SQL Query. Both use TOP
10 but I can see no code for offset=10!?
Any hints? I just updated to 0.3 but it did not solve the problem.
regards,
Achim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
the same result for both
cases.
Achim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
