Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Connection pools

2016-01-06 Thread Chris Wood
, Chris On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 12:02:40 UTC, Chris Wood wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 01:53:59 UTC, Michael Bayer wrote: >> >> >> >> On 12/21/2015 07:44 PM, Chris Wood wrote: >> > Ah, ok - thanks for the explanation - this is different t

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Connection pools

2015-12-22 Thread Chris Wood
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 01:53:59 UTC, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > > On 12/21/2015 07:44 PM, Chris Wood wrote: > > Ah, ok - thanks for the explanation - this is different to how I'd been > > led to believe it worked! However, I know that even when I'm the

[sqlalchemy] Re: Connection pools

2015-12-21 Thread Chris Wood
Ah, ok - thanks for the explanation - this is different to how I'd been led to believe it worked! However, I know that even when I'm the only person testing the application, I'm still getting a large number of connections. Is there a likely explanation why? On Monday, 21 December 2015 18:51:25

[sqlalchemy] Connection pools

2015-12-21 Thread Chris Wood
Hello all, I've inherited a fairly large / complex internal web-based data portal (with a distinct lack of documentation), which is causing some fairly major headaches. The application was originally written with a SQLite backend, but I was asked to convert this to Oracle, which I've done.