Thanks for your response. We will investigate your suggestions for
improving our design and look forward to seeing what you come up with
for 0.7!
On Oct 20, 5:05 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Jasper K wrote:
>
>
>
> > Unfortunately I don't think
On Oct 20, 2:37 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Jasper K wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > We have a use case where we would like to have "incremental updates"
> > to existing session objects (ie. populate_existing()-type behaviour
> > whe
Hi,
We have a use case where we would like to have "incremental updates"
to existing session objects (ie. populate_existing()-type behaviour
where existing object's lazy-loaded attributes are not reset by
subsequent populate_existing queries).
We have come up with a solution by implementing a sub
On Oct 18, 4:06 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Jasper K wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Group,
>
> > I am using SqlAlchemy 0.5.8
>
> > I get an "(OperationalError) no such column: child.child_id" error
> > when trying to eagerloa
Hi Group,
I am using SqlAlchemy 0.5.8
I get an "(OperationalError) no such column: child.child_id" error
when trying to eagerload a viewonly many-to-many relationship that
uses the Association Object pattern with a custom secondaryjoin
condition (http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/mappers.html#ass