[sqlalchemy] Re: Elixir 0.6.1 released!

2008-08-19 Thread Jose Galvez
relationships to be difficult at times Jose Jorge Vargas wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Jose Galvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not trying to be an ass, but what are the advantages to using Elixer well you did sound like one :) the first thing is that declarative is very new

[sqlalchemy] declarative

2008-08-19 Thread Jose Galvez
What is the proposed stability of declarative functions which I guess are pretty new. From what I've read so far I really like it and was thinking of using it, but was just wondering what the long turn outlook for it looked like? After doing some reading on the new release of Elixir, Elixir

[sqlalchemy] Re: declarative

2008-08-19 Thread Jose Galvez
I take it back about Elixir and legacy databases, it seems to work with them just as easy as sqlalchemy does. I'll have to look much closer at Elixir Jose Jose Galvez wrote: What is the proposed stability of declarative functions which I guess are pretty new. From what I've read so far I

[sqlalchemy] Re: Elixir 0.6.1 released!

2008-08-18 Thread Jose Galvez
I'm not trying to be an ass, but what are the advantages to using Elixer over using the declarative syntax such as: from sqlalchemy import * from sqlalchemy.orm import relation, scoped_session, sessionmaker from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base dbe =

[sqlalchemy] Re: SQLAlchemy 0.4beta6 released !!

2007-09-26 Thread Jose Galvez
Dear Micheal, Does this mean that with web apps since the session is now weak referencing that we will no longer have to call Session.remove() to clear out Sessions? Specifically I'm referencing what Mike Orr wrote in the pylonscookbook. Jose Michael Bayer wrote: This should hopefully be the

[sqlalchemy] Re: Import problem

2007-09-20 Thread Jose Galvez
what error do you get is you enter import sqlalchemy Jose Goutham Lakshminarayan wrote: This might trivial to most of u but Iam having problems importing sqlalchemy on windows. The installation went without a problem but when i went to site packages directory there was a

[sqlalchemy] Re: SAContext 0.3.0

2007-07-11 Thread Jose Galvez
(sqlalchemy.key.uri). So what I would advocate is eliminating the special default and just make users specify the correct key, I think that would be much less ambiguous then None Jose On 7/11/07, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/07, Jose Galvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Mike, I've

[sqlalchemy] Re: SAContext 0.3.0

2007-07-11 Thread Jose Galvez
I've just reread the sacontext doc string and realize that what I've said really does not make any sense. To go back a step I would advocate using default rather then None Jose On 7/11/07, Jose Galvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I would prefer not using None and rather making the user pass

[sqlalchemy] Re: query date field

2007-07-07 Thread Jose Galvez
Thanks, everyone for the pointers. Since func is not database agnostic, I think I'll make my own functions in my database module that simply use func so if I ever do switch form mysql to something else at least I'll know where to find all the stuff that needs changing Jose jose wrote: I've got

[sqlalchemy] Re: whats going to break in 0.4

2007-07-05 Thread Jose Galvez
Got it thanks jose Michael Bayer wrote: On Jul 4, 7:30 pm, Jose Galvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Michael, I went back and reread the Proposal thread and I finally get what scalar() does and how it is different form one(). but how would first() differ from scalar() and how would