uld definitely need to create an individual Engine per
> database.
>
> OTOH if these are actually PostgreSQL **schemas** and not databases, that
> would be something entirely different, but you haven't specified this.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Mustafa Demi
E " on the connection ?
>
> creating 18 separate engines would not be that big a deal if that's what
> works best for the code, no issue doing that.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022, at 9:41 AM, Mustafa Demiraslan wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> I am using 3 database engines at the same time, 1
Hi team,
I am using 3 database engines at the same time, 1(include 1 database) +
1(include 1 database) + 1(include 18 database). I use the database
containing 18 databases by switching the bindings. I connect to database
using sessions with session_maker for each engine. During the load test, I
