Thank you very much. That worked :)
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 14:56:25 UTC+1, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/07/2016 05:08 AM, bsdz wrote:
> > No worries and thanks for the suggestions/advice so far.
> >
> > Tbh I tried the mixin approach first as
entity expected - got
''
I'm pretty sure I also tried the abstract approach with similar results.
Perhaps I'm binding incorrectly?
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 18:37:14 UTC+1, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/06/2016 12:50 PM, bsdz wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
&
Thanks for your reply.
I think you misread my code. The method "remove" does exist. It's a method of
MetaData and not tables. See
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_1_0/core/metadata.html#sqlalchemy.schema.MetaData.
I'm not sure about automap. I'm not keen on reflecting all the tables in my
Hi
I am trying to implement optional tables with DeferredReflection. The idea
is in different environments certain tables might exist while not in
others.
I have tried removing the tables from the metadata for the declarative base
if the table's info doesn't list the environment (see below)
Yes, that worked - thanks! :)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi
I'm trying to use DeferredReflection to encapsulate my data model so that
it can easily be instantiated for different environments. However, I am
having trouble creating relationships with a NoForeignKeysError being
raised. I am guessing it is because the table metadata generation is being
