My bad, I didn't notice those notes in the documentation, thank you for
pointing that out.
I understand the reason for the table test1 showing twice, but why doesn't
it when I reflect the public schema (explicitly, not via the None default
schema) after the test2 table ?
If I understand
...
On Apr 13, 5:33 pm, rdunklau rdunk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 13, 3:12 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Apr 13, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
Hello.
Prior to sqlalchemy 0.7.6, we implemented our own mappers to override
the _save_obj and _delete_obj methods
._sa_instance_state)
On Apr 16, 2012, at 9:33 AM, rdunklau wrote:
I followed your suggestions, and implemented it in the following way:
- a SessionListener class, responsible for maintaining the
alternate state of the sesssion is instantiated. The class defines a
before_flush
On Apr 13, 3:12 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Apr 13, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
Hello.
Prior to sqlalchemy 0.7.6, we implemented our own mappers to override
the _save_obj and _delete_obj methods.
that's very interesting. There is an old ticket to
Thank you, I did not think of with_only_columns for the last part.
The part that bother me the most is how to build the column list.
I rewrote my code to only use public attributes and methods:
columns = ColumnCollection(*myselect.inner_columns)
columns.replace(my_column)
Thank you, that is exactly what I needed.
For the record, it also works with primaryjoin defined on the
ColumnProperties (Table2.code etc...) and with a column property.
I'm not sure which side here you'd want to consider foreign, that is, the
column which seeks to match an existing column.
Hello guys.
As a proof of concept, I implemented a hacky python to pl/python
converter using python3 function annotations.
You can see it there if it's of interest to any of you:
https://github.com/rdunklau/pytoplpython
This led me to some questions.
SQLAlchemy automatically manages tables
Thanks for everything.
On 5 oct, 16:39, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 2011, at 2:58 AM, rdunklau wrote:
the correct value t_id is returned.
I ran this exact same test on my postgresql 9.1.1 install, and it
fails.
OK then its a PG 9 thing. We had an almost
Hello.
I'm having a problem with sqlalchemy and postgresql, and I really
don't know what should I do to correct it.
I'm using sqlalchemy. 0.7.3 with postgresql 2.7.2, with the psycopg2
driver and dialect.
I'm using the ORM with reflection, and as I renamed a primary key
column (from id to
