we can try to support it :)
if it works for now, just keep it and I'll try to make sure in 1.3
where I'm doing
https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3423/associationproxy-needs-to-act-more-like-a
that it still works.
the changes in #3423 should make the AP act a lot more nicely if I can
Michael (or anyone listening),
In my example code in #4202
(https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/4202/associationproxy-no-longer-resolved-to)
you mentioned the assocaition proxy to the plain members @property is
probably not a supported pattern.
It's working in my code, but I'd pref
