Re: [sqlalchemy] Deferring a many-to-many mapping

2014-09-15 Thread Brian Rossa
Mike, Thanks for the feedback! (1) The most visible implementations of vanilla many-to-many mappings seem to use sqlalchemy.Table(...). Is that, indeed, the accepted practice? One alternative would be to use a mapped class, but that seems less than parsimonious. all parsimony aside, you

Re: [sqlalchemy] Deferring a many-to-many mapping

2014-09-13 Thread Michael Bayer
On Sep 12, 2014, at 8:46 PM, Brian the Lion brian.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am having trouble deferring a many-to-many mapping. I just had a couple of questions related there-to: (1) The most visible implementations of vanilla many-to-many mappings seem to use

[sqlalchemy] Deferring a many-to-many mapping

2014-09-12 Thread Brian the Lion
Hi all, I am having trouble deferring a many-to-many mapping. I just had a couple of questions related there-to: (1) The most visible implementations of vanilla many-to-many mappings seem to use sqlalchemy.Table(...). Is that, indeed, the accepted practice? One alternative would be to use a