Re: [sqlalchemy] Erratic behaviour with relationship primaryjoin using bindparam

2015-10-23 Thread Mike Bayer
On 10/23/15 5:41 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 2:57:32 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > > On 10/22/15 7:22 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to unravel some spaghetti code by using > bindparams in >

Re: [sqlalchemy] Erratic behaviour with relationship primaryjoin using bindparam

2015-10-23 Thread chris
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 2:57:32 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > > On 10/22/15 7:22 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to unravel some spaghetti code by using bindparams in > > relationships, which at first seemed like a neat solution to my > >

Re: [sqlalchemy] Erratic behaviour with relationship primaryjoin using bindparam

2015-10-23 Thread chris
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:52:24 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > > On 10/23/15 5:41 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 2:57:32 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/22/15 7:22 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > > >

[sqlalchemy] Erratic behaviour with relationship primaryjoin using bindparam

2015-10-22 Thread chris
Hi, I've been trying to unravel some spaghetti code by using bindparams in relationships, which at first seemed like a neat solution to my problems. Unfortunately, it seems to have some behaviour that I find erratic or unpredictable. I'm sure it's perfectly explicable, but I'd like to be able

Re: [sqlalchemy] Erratic behaviour with relationship primaryjoin using bindparam

2015-10-22 Thread Mike Bayer
On 10/22/15 7:22 AM, ch...@lystable.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to unravel some spaghetti code by using bindparams in > relationships, which at first seemed like a neat solution to my > problems. Unfortunately, it seems to have some behaviour that I find > erratic or unpredictable.