Am 13.06.2013, 00:42 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
Ah, okay. I think I understand what I was missing initially. I've had
another go at this and it seems to work as required, even on MySQL. Not
sure how this all works with SQLAlchemy but I would expect it to be fine
with it.
insert into
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:59:16 AM UTC-7, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 13.06.2013, 00:42 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com javascript::
Ah, okay. I think I understand what I was missing initially. I've had
another go at this and it seems to work as required, even on MySQL.
Not
sure
Am 13.06.2013, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
It's the original issue. The relation (that I want the ORM to see) isn't
what's literally set in the schema by foreign keys, and the
primaryjoin/foreign_keys ORM magic for this IMO sucks. Something like
onetomany and manytoone in the
Am 11.06.2013, 23:47 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
I could do that, but I'd change the foreign key in favorites to point at
group_things, since your favorite group must be a group that you're in.
Then I'd drop the other foreign key constraint as unnecessary, since it's
implied by the new
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:52:27 AM UTC-7, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 11.06.2013, 23:47 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com javascript::
I could do that, but I'd change the foreign key in favorites to point at
group_things, since your favorite group must be a group that you're in.
Then
On Friday, June 7, 2013 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 07.06.2013, 01:13 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com javascript::
I may be misunderstanding the question, but the reason that having a
favorite is optional is because I'm using mysql and mysql doesn't
supported
Am 07.06.2013, 00:05 Uhr, schrieb Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com:
can you show me the alternate design you have in mind? I'm not sure
what normalize to favorites with strict 1:1 looks like.
this is all just my own curiosity. the issue at hand is something
different.
Well, I
Am 07.06.2013, 01:13 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
I may be misunderstanding the question, but the reason that having a
favorite is optional is because I'm using mysql and mysql doesn't
supported deferred constraints.
Oh, I feel your pain! But you are using an engine that at leasts
I've written a handful of primaryjoin and secondaryjoin attributes on
Relationships. This mechanism is flexible, but it's error-prone, and I
think that, at least for all the cases I've personally encountered, there
could be a better way. As an example, I have:
thing = Table('thing',
On Jun 6, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Andy aml...@gmail.com wrote:
I've written a handful of primaryjoin and secondaryjoin attributes on
Relationships. This mechanism is flexible, but it's error-prone, and I think
that, at least for all the cases I've personally encountered, there could be
a
On Jun 6, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
Not only that, but we are now placing ORM-specific configuration into our
Table metadata. What's wrong with doing it in relationship()?Clearly,
the way primaryjoin works, in that it's an expression, is
Am 06.06.2013, 20:21 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
IOW I have things and groups. The rel table is a many-to-many relation
between things and groups. A thing also may have a favorite group; if
so,
there has to be a rel between that thing and its favorite group.
Are favourites
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu
wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 20:21 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
IOW I have things and groups. The rel table is a many-to-many relation
between things and groups. A thing also may have a favorite group; if so,
Am 06.06.2013, 23:36 Uhr, schrieb Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 20:21 Uhr, schrieb Andy aml...@gmail.com:
IOW I have things and groups. The rel table is a many-to-many relation
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu
wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 23:36 Uhr, schrieb Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 20:21 Uhr, schrieb Andy
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:40:57 PM UTC-7, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 23:36 Uhr, schrieb Michael Bayer
mik...@zzzcomputing.comjavascript::
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Charlie Clark
charli...@clark-consulting.eu javascript: wrote:
Am 06.06.2013, 20:21 Uhr, schrieb
16 matches
Mail list logo
