On Thu, 1 May 2008 12:20:39 -0400
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at first the second method seemed a little hacky to me, but now that
i think about it, we're in the sharded query so removing the extra
entity is not a big deal.The first method is probably not as
fragile as
I've done some more work on this little project and have managed to
produce a significantly more idiomatic version. Since it has turned into
a full blown patch series, I'll save your inboxes and direct you
to the whole queue at
http://raidi.us/edarc/sqlalchemy
This contains the iterator
