On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:16 AM Jayson Reis wrote:
>
> Hi there, I guess I will try to change in the next following days.
> Do you think a change like this is worth it for SQLAlchemy?
big time, if you are seeing the join be the difference between 8
seconds and 100ms. at first I wasnt sure
Hi there, I guess I will try to change in the next following days.
Do you think a change like this is worth it for SQLAlchemy?
Jayson Reis
Em qui, 20 de set de 2018 às 16:31, Mike Bayer
escreveu:
> for guidance on how the flag is added, look at the "innerjoin=True"
> flag on joinedload() /
for guidance on how the flag is added, look at the "innerjoin=True"
flag on joinedload() / relationship().
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:30 AM Mike Bayer wrote:
>
> you would need to change the code here:
>
> https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/blob/master/lib/sqlalchemy/orm/strategies.py#L1914
>
>
you would need to change the code here:
https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/blob/master/lib/sqlalchemy/orm/strategies.py#L1914
however, you can't just change the query to unconditionally not
include the parent table, because you don't know what the
"primaryjoin" is.for this to be automatic,
Hi there everyone.
I would like to ask if there is a way to change how selectinload run its
query.
I put an example [1] that will show you sort of how my data is structured
so you can have an idea, but the gist is:
I have a main table (like customers) and another table (like order) which
