Sorry, I've re-checked, it was my typo, all properties co-exist ok,
Thanks again,
Alex
On 26 сент, 21:37, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Alex K wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks, Michael.
>
> > I've just tried your example with column_property, everything works
> >
On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Alex K wrote:
>
> Thanks, Michael.
>
> I've just tried your example with column_property, everything works
> fine, except one thing:
>
> Does column_property hides the properties it relies on?
>
> So, once I added full_name, last_name and first_name disappeared, is
>
Using comparable property as a selected element in SQL is a use case
which hasn't been addressed as of yet - the main usage was so far just
for producing WHERE/ORDER BY/etc. expressions. In particular, the
comparable property doesn't have any query setup capabilities (i.e.
where it puts
Thanks, Michael.
I've just tried your example with column_property, everything works
fine, except one thing:
Does column_property hides the properties it relies on?
So, once I added full_name, last_name and first_name disappeared, is
it possible to have them existing along with full_name?
Alex
