Thanks for the reply.  I wonder if Pylons is responsible for ignoring
that exception.  My project is at such an early stage that it hasn't
even grown any exception-handling code yet, so I know my own code
didn't catch an exception and neglect to raise it or something.

Anyway, not something I need to get to the bottom of, just wanted to
hear someone's perspective on it.  Thank you for supplying one.

E

On Mar 9, 10:55 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Eric Ongerth wrote:
>
> > Finally after enough hair loss, I stopped poring over the tracebacks
> > shown in the Pylons error response, and went directly to the paster
> > debug logs.  Hmm!  What was actually happening was that a foreign key
> > relationship was being violated (or i guess you could say just not
> > satisfied) by the value I was trying to save (update).  The foreign
> > key error message went to the log where I wasn't looking, because I
> > typically only look there if the in-browser Pylons error response is
> > absent or otherwise hung up.  Meanwhile for some reason the ultimate
> > result was showing up as Connection Already Closed.  So maybe the
> > underlying Foreign Key error resulted in the connection closing, and
> > something in the way SA handled that led to the Connection error, and
> > I only saw the latter because I hadn't thought to look for an error
> > beneath the error.
>
> this seems like an error in how you are integrating with Pylons, or
> how Pylons is integrated with exception throws.  An exception throw
> was ignored, and control passed to your regular view template as
> though it were a successful request.   This kind of bug is pretty
> common in a lot of software but it lies within how SQLA is integrated
> here.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to