On Nov 30, 11:57 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.2.2 over here produces regular datetime objects.
Ah, well, thanks for the information.
-Samuel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
1.2.2 over here produces regular datetime objects.
On Nov 30, 5:45 pm, Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 11:21 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Row: DateTime object for '2007-11-30 22:54:54.00' at 405a79f8
thats not a sqlalchemy DateTime object. are you on a very old
On Nov 30, 4:59 pm, Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:15 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a DateTime, meaning a sqlalchemy.types.DateTime ?
Yes. (sqlalchemy 0.3)
thats not a date-
holding object, its a TypeEngine object which describes a date-holding
database
On Nov 30, 10:15 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a DateTime, meaning a sqlalchemy.types.DateTime ?
Yes. (sqlalchemy 0.3)
thats not a date-
holding object, its a TypeEngine object which describes a date-holding
database column. from the code sample below I dont see how that
