Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Firebird and rowcount

2010-04-12 Thread Michael Bayer
nekto0n wrote: Wow. That was fast =) Thanks for the fix. I'm a bit confused with results on 0.6beta3. Timer showed significant speed boost and profiler (and breakpoint in _CursorFairy) didn't show attempts to get rowcount. Am I doing something wrong? 0.6 is faster overall but I checked the

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Firebird and rowcount

2010-04-12 Thread Michael Bayer
On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:00 AM, nekto0n wrote: Wow. That was fast =) Thanks for the fix. I'm a bit confused with results on 0.6beta3. Timer showed significant speed boost and profiler (and breakpoint in _CursorFairy) didn't show attempts to get rowcount. Am I doing something wrong? OK,

[sqlalchemy] Re: Firebird and rowcount

2010-04-11 Thread nekto0n
Wow. That was fast =) Thanks for the fix. I'm a bit confused with results on 0.6beta3. Timer showed significant speed boost and profiler (and breakpoint in _CursorFairy) didn't show attempts to get rowcount. Am I doing something wrong? On Apr 12, 2:39 am, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com