And when I am at it (this is going off topic): What do you think about len(query) in addition to or instead of query.count()? IMO, count() is nearly as SQLish als select().
Best regards Klaus On Jul 6, 3:20 pm, klaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that Session has no method len. Wouldn't it be useful to add > one, like this: > > --- orm/session.py 2007-07-06 14:38:22.000000000 +0200 > +++ orm/session.py.orig 2007-07-06 14:43:48.000000000 +0200 > @@ -642,6 +642,9 @@ > def __iter__(self): > return iter(list(self.uow.new) + > self.uow.identity_map.values()) > > + def __len__(self): > + return len(self.uow.new) + len(self.uow.identity_map) > + > def _get(self, key): > return self.identity_map[key] > > Then, one could flush() and clear() it if it grows too large. > (Generally, I think any class with __iter__ should have __len__ too.) > > Best regards > Klaus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
