meron
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 1:41 PM
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
Hmm, it's kind of hard to say whether the code you just posted is OK or not,
without knowing what those 2 classes represent. It kind of looks to me
And the
view is just calling controller functions and displaying the model to the user.
Make sense?
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of gpitel
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 1:08 PM
To: sqlalchemy
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: In
On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:07 PM, gpitel wrote:
> What you are saying makes perfect sense. Thank you for showing me the
> light. The code below incorporates what I think you were saying and
> allows me to still test it easily. Thanks again. A+++ for the
> SQLAlchemy community!!!
A+++ for Cameron
legroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Jackson, Cameron
> Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 12:45 PM
> To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
>
> You are correct that an object should initialise itsel
@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
You are correct that an object should initialise itself, but don't take that to
mean that Test0 should be responsible for every use case where a Test0 is going
to be created. If you need some logic that says
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of gpitel
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 12:27 PM
To: sqlalchemy
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
Thanks for the quick response. I am not a programmer by tra
Thanks for the quick response. I am not a programmer by trade, so your
insight is a great help.
My program is split up into a model, a view, and a controller.
I have been validating my model using unit testing ( from what I have
read testing the controller and view is debatable). The reason I hav
