On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:28 PM, john.goodleaf wrote:
>
> It looks like it might be easier to define a Table object using the
> view, specifying a PrimaryKeyConstraint and then using the mapper
> function to tie it to a class. Do you think this would work?
that's exactly how it would work, you jus
It looks like it might be easier to define a Table object using the
view, specifying a PrimaryKeyConstraint and then using the mapper
function to tie it to a class. Do you think this would work? Would I
need to write a properties argument to the mapper?
Apologies if these are stupid questions. I
On Oct 24, 2008, at 11:41 AM, john.goodleaf wrote:
>
> So here's the problem. I am faced with two legacy systems outside my
> control. One is SQL Server and the other is Oracle. In both only views
> are exposed to me and I don't anticipate that changing.
>
> I'd like to map these views to object
