[sqlalchemy] Re: Merging and PGArray

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Bayer
this is committed in the latest trunk and will be in 0.5.5. Michael Bayer wrote: > > Ok we'll have to ensure this doesn't break anything, that line doesn't > seem to be covered in the current unit tests > > Roel van Os wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 12-06-2009 16:22, Michael Bayer wrote: >>> thi

[sqlalchemy] Re: Merging and PGArray

2009-06-12 Thread Michael Bayer
Ok we'll have to ensure this doesn't break anything, that line doesn't seem to be covered in the current unit tests Roel van Os wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 12-06-2009 16:22, Michael Bayer wrote: >> this is likely a bug. try out the patch below (against the latest 0.5 >> release): >> > > After ap

[sqlalchemy] Re: Merging and PGArray

2009-06-12 Thread Roel van Os
Hi Michael, On 12-06-2009 16:22, Michael Bayer wrote: > this is likely a bug. try out the patch below (against the latest 0.5 > release): > After applying the patch it works perfectly. Thanks a lot! Regards, Roel > Index: lib/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py > ==

[sqlalchemy] Re: Merging and PGArray

2009-06-12 Thread Michael Bayer
this is likely a bug. try out the patch below (against the latest 0.5 release): Index: lib/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py === --- lib/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py (revision 6049) +++ lib/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py (working copy) @@ -111,8 +111,8 @