[sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears

2008-05-13 Thread Bryn Divey
to distinguish which database to use for everything else. Barry - Original Message From: Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 5:05:22 PM Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears On May 8, 2008, at 11:15

[sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears

2008-05-08 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 8, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Bryn Divey wrote: We're building an application on TG 1.0.2 using SQLAlchemy 0.3.11 are are busy considering our options wrt multiple customer support. We'd be hosting the app servers, and there's a low upper-bound to the traffic they'll be hit with, so we're

[sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears

2008-05-08 Thread Bobby Impollonia
I'd try bypassing their SQLA integration altogether if thats possible It isn't possible if you are relying on the turbogears identity system (cookie-based visitor tracking and access control). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears

2008-05-08 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 8, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Bobby Impollonia wrote: I'd try bypassing their SQLA integration altogether if thats possible It isn't possible if you are relying on the turbogears identity system (cookie-based visitor tracking and access control). that sounds like a particular set of

[sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears

2008-05-08 Thread Barry Hart
- Original Message From: Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 5:05:22 PM Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: Multiple SQLAlchemy DB usage in TurboGears On May 8, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Bobby Impollonia wrote: I'd try bypassing their SQLA integration