On 1/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 7:28 pm, Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The basic idea of a persistence layer (as I understand it) is that you
attempt to isolate applications from the database to the point that the
application and the data model can vary
On 1/27/07, Allen Bierbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that a complete separation is probably either a) impossible or
b) going to lead to code that is so complex and difficult to maintain
that it removes any advantage gained.
I modify the schema and code in step during development, once
On Jan 27, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Allen Bierbaum wrote:
As a side note, I am trying to see where ActiveMapper would fit into
all of this. At first I thought that ActiveMapper would actually tie
the classes closer to the data model, but after looking at it further
I am starting to think that it
Mike,
On a side note, do u have any ideas about supporting stored procedures
in some way? Be it just knowing about them and maybe calling them, or
on the other end, generating them?
IMO they are _some_ way to hide some of those session.queries...
Although i'm just extrapolating my own vision
