you cant do it right now. but its something we could support. its
unclear to me if we should just go for composite types as the way to
do it, or just use a callable. using a composite is likely cleaner
and would integrate with the save process better (otherwise, the
callable needs to
is that something looking like real concrete-polymorphism?
AFAIremember there was something composite there in the pattern.. the id is
actualy (id,type)
Michael Bayer wrote:
you cant do it right now. but its something we could support. its
unclear to me if we should just go for composite
