On Jun 7, 12:42 am, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> Below is a short test, can you figure out what you might be doing differently
> ?
[snip]
Michael, thanks very much. The database I'm looking at is my test
database for the application I'm developing and it gets used and
abused quite often and it's en
On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Geoff wrote:
> On Jun 6, 11:32 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>
>> The table referenced by "secondary=" in a relationship() is managed
>> entirely, regardless of cascade setting, but
>> only from the perspective of the parent. Meaning if A references a
>> collection of
On Jun 6, 11:32 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> The table referenced by "secondary=" in a relationship() is managed entirely,
> regardless of cascade setting, but
> only from the perspective of the parent. Meaning if A references a
> collection of B, the row in a_to_b will be
> deleted if you 1. d
