Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Simple Queries as ORM classes

2010-10-22 Thread Marc Munro
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 17:07 -0700, Michael Bayer wrote: > > On Oct 22, 6:58 pm, Marc Munro wrote: > [ dumb question deleted ] > why not map a class to your view/table/select statement in the normal > fashion ? > > tables: > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/tutorial.html#setting-up-the-mapping

[sqlalchemy] Re: Simple Queries as ORM classes

2010-10-22 Thread Michael Bayer
On Oct 22, 6:58 pm, Marc Munro wrote: > I'd like to be able to define a query in the same way that I can define > a table.  This would give me a consistent interface to all relations, > whether views, tables or queries. > > I'd like to be able to define my queries somthing like this: > > class A