[sqlalchemy] Re: Two questions regarding unions.

2010-10-10 Thread Berteun
On Oct 9, 7:27 pm, Berteun wrote: > > That's a bug and is addressed by ticket #1943 which includes a patch, and > > it would be extremely helpful if you could run this patch through your own > > tests before we commit it.  http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1943 > > I can do that testing at t

[sqlalchemy] Re: Two questions regarding unions.

2010-10-09 Thread Berteun
On 9 okt, 17:39, Michael Bayer wrote: > On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Berteun wrote: > I will start off by saying that the labeling applied to the NamedTuple > returned by Query was not originally intended to be a general purpose method > of targeting columns in the result.   That approach doesn't