[sqlalchemy] Re: Two relationships with a same backref name. Is that (even) possible or I got everything wrong?

2010-11-12 Thread Eric Ongerth
You're welcome, and I hope that works for you. I went through the same process a few years ago when picking up SqlAlchemy... the backref facility is so cool that it's easy to forget that it's optional and that most relationship backrefs /could/ be handled as just another relationship on the

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Two relationships with a same backref name. Is that (even) possible or I got everything wrong?

2010-11-12 Thread Hector Blanco
Yeah... I'm pretty newbie myself with sqlalchemy, so when I discovered that I could specify primary joins, secondary... and all that juicy stuff in the backref I got so into writing it from A -- to -- B that I forgot that it can be done B --from-- A :) Thanks again! 2010/11/12 Eric Ongerth

[sqlalchemy] Re: Two relationships with a same backref name. Is that (even) possible or I got everything wrong?

2010-11-11 Thread Eric Ongerth
Hi Hector, If I'm not mistaken, everywhere you wrote (MyObject.id==MyObject.containerId), you meant to write: (Container.id==MyObject.containerId). Instead of the backref technique, why not just create the MyObject-- Container relationship a single time in your MyObject class. That should be