[sqlalchemy] Re: about cascade rule

2007-02-01 Thread Dennis
On Feb 1, 5:24 am, Manlio Perillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I still do not fully understand cascade rules, however I want to be sure the behaviour below is a feature and not a bug. Did you intend for the B object to be able to not exist? I modified your code to create a b object as

[sqlalchemy] Re: about cascade rule

2007-02-01 Thread Michael Bayer
delete-orphan on the A relationship means, no A is allowed to exist in the database without a parent B. the rule used to be more lax and would only fire off when an A was removed from a B...but that missed a lot of cases. the specificness of the error message indicates its definitely not a bug

[sqlalchemy] Re: about cascade rule

2007-02-01 Thread Manlio Perillo
Michael Bayer ha scritto: delete-orphan on the A relationship means, no A is allowed to exist in the database without a parent B. the rule used to be more lax and would only fire off when an A was removed from a B...but that missed a lot of cases. the specificness of the error message