Yes indeed - it has been fixed in 0.4 beta 3. I think I'll just switch
to 0.4 now before I've done too much coding with 0.3
Thanks again Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
T
you might want to try 0.4 where i think this has been fixed; else we
can file a new trac ticket.
On Aug 18, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Andy Hird wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm not sure if this is a known bug or whether I'm doing something
> obviously wrong.
>
> Using Oracle 10g, say I've got a pre-existing table s
