Federico Caselli writes:
> Updated here https://gerrit.sqlalchemy.org/c/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/+/2959
Great, thank you!
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
l...@metapensiero.it |
Updated here https://gerrit.sqlalchemy.org/c/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/+/2959
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 14:00:33 UTC+2 leleg...@gmail.com wrote:
> Federico Caselli writes:
>
> > There is no difference, it's the documentation that's outdated.
> >
> > We should update that
>
> I see, thank you for
Federico Caselli writes:
> There is no difference, it's the documentation that's outdated.
>
> We should update that
I see, thank you for the clarification!
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi
There is no difference, it's the documentation that's outdated.
We should update that
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 09:22:52 UTC+2 leleg...@gmail.com wrote:
> Federico Caselli writes:
>
> > As the warning mebtions, the issue is that you are using the string name
> > with load only instead of the
Federico Caselli writes:
> As the warning mebtions, the issue is that you are using the string name
> with load only instead of the column from the class.
Ok, so maybe we should explain the difference in the joinedload().load_only()
documentation? As said, the sample code attached to the
