Fine with me. ;-)
Klaus
On Nov 23, 6:37 am, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there -
there are actually two bugs here, the second one is revealed after
repairing the first.
The first bug is that the merge() dont_load operation was not
completing all the necessary housekeeping
Hi again,
Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible since the lazy
loaded instance are already merged in the session
On Nov 23, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Pierre-Yves Strub wrote:
Hi again,
Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible since
Hi there -
there are actually two bugs here, the second one is revealed after
repairing the first.
The first bug is that the merge() dont_load operation was not
completing all the necessary housekeeping on the newly generated copy
of the instance, such that the lazy loader for zone (or
