Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: question about `association_proxy` interface

2018-10-03 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 9:40:37 AM UTC-4, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > those are not going to change within 1.2 or 1.3 but it's not ideal to > be relying on them. For query._entities, you can use the public > accessor query.column_descriptions. for _with_options I'm not sure > what it i

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: question about `association_proxy` interface

2018-10-03 Thread Mike Bayer
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:44 PM Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > And a quick followup to Michael: > > I didn't want to pollute the comments in > https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3225/query-heuristic-inspection-system > as there may not have been any substantial changes and I'm just revie

[sqlalchemy] Re: question about `association_proxy` interface

2018-10-02 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
And a quick followup to Michael: I didn't want to pollute the comments in https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3225/query-heuristic-inspection-system as there may not have been any substantial changes and I'm just reviewing my old notes wrong... How long do you think it is safe to