[sqlalchemy] Re: session lifecycle and wsgi

2010-04-29 Thread Laurence Rowe
On Apr 28, 4:38 pm, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Laurence Rowe wrote: Chris, This is what the combination of repoze.tm2/transaction and zope.sqlalchemy does for you. You don't have to do anything special other than that. It doesn't do the .remove(). BFG currently has a

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: session lifecycle and wsgi

2010-04-29 Thread Chris Withers
no longer believe this is necessary, pending absolute confirmation from Michael in the Re: [sqlalchemy] session lifecycle and wsgi thread. It's certainly not necessary to do the close() *and* the remove() ;-) cheers, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sqlalchemy] Re: session lifecycle and wsgi

2010-04-28 Thread Laurence Rowe
Chris, This is what the combination of repoze.tm2/transaction and zope.sqlalchemy does for you. You don't have to do anything special other than that. Laurence On Apr 28, 2:37 pm, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I'm still trying to get an answer on this... Am I right in

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: session lifecycle and wsgi

2010-04-28 Thread Chris Withers
Laurence Rowe wrote: Chris, This is what the combination of repoze.tm2/transaction and zope.sqlalchemy does for you. You don't have to do anything special other than that. It doesn't do the .remove(). BFG currently has a bit of horribleness to make that work. I'd like to get rid of it or make