That is, in my case, lifetime of objects is much longer that
lifetime of all database-and-related stuff - and seems this is not
expected pattern of usage.
more questions on the theme.
What is the expected sequence / lifetime / pattern-of-usage for
engine, metadata, mappers, and finally, my
On Jun 21, 2007, at 6:59 AM, svilen wrote:
more questions on the theme.
What is the expected sequence / lifetime / pattern-of-usage for
engine, metadata, mappers, and finally, my objects?
mappers need tables and therefore metadata, objects have mapped
properties and therefore mappers. no
thanks a lot, that cleared some mist.
btw u can make a entry on the FAQ from this... e.g. lifetimes and
usage patterns - or similar.
The other rule inferred from above problem is
b) objects lifetime should be shorter than mappers (ORM); else
one needs to delete o._instance_key and
i think i found something...
i am doing testing about these links and nodes.
For each testcase i have one constant set of nodes, and then trying
different scenarios with various combination of links.
Each scenario creates all database stuff a new - db, metadata,
mappers, session - and after
