Kent wrote:
> I was considering the "one" side of a many to one, where setting the
> backref would be trivial during merge since we already have the object
> and know what it is. However, I see how that would be
> inconsistent ... "why does the orm set this only in one direction?"
> would be the q
I was considering the "one" side of a many to one, where setting the
backref would be trivial during merge since we already have the object
and know what it is. However, I see how that would be
inconsistent ... "why does the orm set this only in one direction?"
would be the question.
Anyway, 95%
