On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:39:25 -0400
Kyle Schaffrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:24 -0400
> Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But yes its probably how that section should be done anyway so
> > that ShardedQuery so that the iterative framework provided by
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:24 -0400
Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But yes its probably how that section should be done anyway so that
> ShardedQuery so that the iterative framework provided by
> iterate_instances() (this method would need to be used instead of
> instances()).
On Apr 27, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Kyle Schaffrick wrote:
> partial = partial + list(...)
>
> The bits inside that list() calls up to Query.instances for each shard
> in the for loop, which seems to return an iterator.
>
> Assuming the desired ordering can be figured out from that spot, and a
> pytho
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:24:10 -0400
Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2008, at 7:39 AM, crybaby wrote:
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, as of right now, relationship between
> > multiple db shards, like sorting, grouping and joins have to be done
> > in application level.
>
On Mar 27, 2008, at 7:39 AM, crybaby wrote:
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, as of right now, relationship between
> multiple db shards, like sorting, grouping and joins have to be done
> in application level.
that is correct; the ShardedQuery currently just concatentates results
from each indiv
Correct me if I am wrong, as of right now, relationship between
multiple db shards, like sorting, grouping and joins have to be done
in application level.
Joe
On Mar 26, 11:02 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2008, at 7:46 PM, crybaby wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am thinking of se
On Mar 24, 2008, at 7:46 PM, crybaby wrote:
>
> I am thinking of setting up a small sharding db as an example. I have
> a question about how one would be able to combine sort result from
> multiple db and still maintain the sort order?
>
> Anyone have any suggestions?
>
since noone has made an
