Hey,
Michael Bayer wrote:
[snip]
The part missing for me here is that bar, if its a MappedCollection,
is not itself a mapped object in the same sense that foo or baz
is. Keep in mind that a SQLAlchemy relation looks like:
mapped class - collection - mapped class - (etc.)
Yes,
Hey Michael,
Thanks for the helpful answer.
Michael Bayer wrote:
[snip]
(after I've reread the above
two paragraphs many times it seems like the idea is that the target
object doesn't know anything about the name of the relation in which
its collected).
The idea is that if the object
On Aug 18, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
The idea is that if the object graph says:
foo.bar.baz
that'll be:
bar.__name__ == 'bar'
bar.__parent__ is foo
baz.__name__ == 'baz'
baz.__parent__ is bar
In this case:
foo.bar[key]
it'll be:
bar[key].__parent__ is foo.bar
