kl. 20:26:24 UTC+2 lørdag 26. april 2014 skrev Michael Bayer følgende:
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Michael Bayer
> >
> wrote:
>
> If OTOH you do in fact want this query to take the current Company.id into
> account, this would be simple using primaryjoin/secondaryjoin/secondary, it
> j
On Apr 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
> If OTOH you do in fact want this query to take the current Company.id into
> account, this would be simple using primaryjoin/secondaryjoin/secondary, it
> just requires that the IN is unwrapped into a regular join criterion. Assume
> the na
On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Peder Husom wrote:
> Hi, I've been to the IRC channel and gotten alot of help from "inklesspen",
> but I can't seem to figure this out.
>
> I have these tree tables;
>
> Users
> - iduser
> - name
>
> Companies
> - idcompany
> - name
>
> CompaniesUsers
> -
Hi, I've been to the IRC channel and gotten alot of help from "inklesspen",
but I can't seem to figure this out.
I have these tree tables;
Users
- iduser
- name
Companies
- idcompany
- name
CompaniesUsers
- companyid
- userid
- owner (TINYINT|Boolean)
Now in my "Company" class I want
