Oh, it wasn't exactly an error with the Synonyms itself. They are
working fine for what I've been doing with them (just using them for
getters/setters... nothing fancy) It was more that when I migrated the
Synonyms I have in the 0.6.8 to hybrid_properties in 0.7.4, I was
getting trouble (which I'm
Hello everyone!
In my application, I have a class Product that can belong to a
Category. (1 product, 1 category). The category knows which products
belong to it thanks to a backref. A product can not exist if
it doesn't belong to a category. If a category is deleted, all it's
products are deleted
Sorry, I messed up the subject of the email
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hector Blanco white.li...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/12/10
Subject: SqlAclhemy 0.6.8
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Hello everyone!
In my application, I have a class Product that can belong to a
Category. (1
On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Hector Blanco wrote:
That data (is JSON) is sent to the Category handler. That handler
does the following
1) Creates a new Category() instance,
2) Fill the non-relationship fields (_name in this case)
3) Adds the category to the session, so it gets an _id
Thank you for your reply.
I'm not exactly sure of what is blocking the insert. I would say
SqlAlchemy, because my Foreign Keys are nullable (which raises the
question of whether it's a good design or not... but that's a
different story)
I read in the documentation:
if you have a relationship() with delete-orphan, SQLAlchemy will not let you
save the child without the parent being attached. It is more or less a bug in
that this particular check is unnecessary, and you should upgrade to 0.7.
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Hector Blanco wrote:
Thank you
I would like to. I've been testing 0.7.4, and it seems to work really
fast, but my code is heavily dependent on Synonyms, which seem to be
incompatible with certain new features (I'm getting errors when I use
order_by, for instance) so, until I have time to migrate my code to
Hibrids, I'm afraid I
