On 9/20/2010 10:54 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which says I should be able to do a 'SIMILAR TO' construct
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:54 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which
On 9/21/2010 7:23 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:54 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which says I should be able to do a 'SIMILAR TO' construct which is perhaps
somewhat more lightweight than a full regexp.
Can someone show me
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which says I should be able to do a 'SIMILAR TO' construct which is perhaps
somewhat more lightweight
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which says I should be able to do a 'SIMILAR TO'
On 9/20/2010 10:57 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 10:09 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/20/2010 9:38 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Scratch that ... found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com/msg18598.html
which
On 9/14/2010 2:23 PM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Is it possible to use a regexp in a like() clause? Or some other way to achieve
something similar?
Can anyone suggest an approach to search a field with a regexp?
Thanks,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/14/2010 2:23 PM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Is it possible to use a regexp in a like() clause? Or some other way to
achieve
something similar?
Can anyone suggest an approach to search a field with a regexp?
if you were using Postgresql, you
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Michael Hipp wrote:
On 9/14/2010 2:23 PM, Michael Hipp wrote:
Is it possible to use a regexp in a like() clause? Or some other way to
achieve
Is it possible to use a regexp in a like() clause? Or some other way to achieve
something similar?
Thanks,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
11 matches
Mail list logo