On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 4:34:35 AM UTC-5, Simon King wrote:
>
>
> (expr1 == expr2) & (expr3 == expr4)
>
you usually won't need to & or and_ though.
filter automatically "and"s a list.
.filter(expr1 == expr2, expr3 == expr4)
the only you need to use `and_` is when doing
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Krishnakant wrote:
> Hello all,
> The subject might have made my problem already clear.
> So I am unclear about when I should use the normal Python "and " vs the
> sqlalchemy "and_" while writing where, having or similar queries including
Hello all,
The subject might have made my problem already clear.
So I am unclear about when I should use the normal Python "and " vs the
sqlalchemy "and_" while writing where, having or similar queries
including joins.
I have tryed understanding this but may be I have overlooked some thing.