Re: [sqlalchemy] _DBProxy.dispose() doesn't actually dispose of the pool/connections?

2012-11-16 Thread Carl Meyer
Thanks Michael. On 11/15/2012 08:41 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: that's possible, it's a pretty old, little used, API, and that document probably assumes GC will pick up on it, and it would be better if dispose() was called on the pool all the way through. But the garbage collector should be

Re: [sqlalchemy] _DBProxy.dispose() doesn't actually dispose of the pool/connections?

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Bayer
On Nov 15, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Carl Meyer wrote: Hi, I'm using SQLAlchemy's connection pool implementation directly (via manage() and _DBProxy), and it seems to me that _DBProxy does not dispose of its pools/connections the way that the documentation/docstrings/method names seem to imply it