Hello,
To generate json from our SQLAlchemy model objects, we are using
iterate_properties to determine how to dictify the object. One of our objects
uses association_proxy which we would like to represent in the JSON.
Unfortunately, because it is not a property, the dictification misses this
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:14 AM, A.M. wrote:
Hello,
To generate json from our SQLAlchemy model objects, we are using
iterate_properties to determine how to dictify the object. One of our
objects uses association_proxy which we would like to represent in the JSON.
Unfortunately, because it
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:14 AM, A.M. wrote:
Hello,
To generate json from our SQLAlchemy model objects, we are using
iterate_properties to determine how to dictify the object. One of our
objects uses association_proxy which we would
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:05 AM, A.M. age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:14 AM, A.M. wrote:
To generate json from our SQLAlchemy model objects, we are using
iterate_properties to determine how to dictify the object.
On Nov 16, 2010, at 12:05 PM, A.M. wrote:
2. implicit conversion to JSON and such is a little sloppy. You'd be
better off using a structured approach like Colander:
http://docs.repoze.org/colander/
It looks like I would have to either re-define all objects using the Colander
syntax
