On Feb 27, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>
>> On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>>
More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
standard Session class make a difference?
>>>
>>> t
On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>
>>> More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
>>> standard Session class make a difference?
>>
>> the unit of work issues INSERTS in order for a single kind of enti
On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
standard Session class make a difference?
the unit of work issues INSERTS in order for a single kind of entity.It
doesn't do that across all entities since the dependency
On Feb 26, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 26/02/2011 15:50, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/02/2011 17:13, Michael Bayer wrote:
can't reproduce. See attached.This test includes randomization of all
key data structures in the UOW which smokes out any issues in depen
On 26/02/2011 15:50, Michael Bayer wrote:
On 25/02/2011 17:13, Michael Bayer wrote:
can't reproduce. See attached.This test includes randomization of all key
data structures in the UOW which smokes out any issues in dependency sorting.
Okay, so after about an hour of stripping down cod
On Feb 26, 2011, at 4:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 25/02/2011 17:13, Michael Bayer wrote:
>> can't reproduce. See attached.This test includes randomization of all
>> key data structures in the UOW which smokes out any issues in dependency
>> sorting.
>
> Okay, so after about an hour o
On 25/02/2011 17:13, Michael Bayer wrote:
can't reproduce. See attached.This test includes randomization of all key
data structures in the UOW which smokes out any issues in dependency sorting.
Okay, so after about an hour of stripping down code, please find
attached a minimal reproducib
